Students design and carry out an osmosis investigation and write it up individually.
Enzyme rate practical with an assessed write-up.
Ends with an independent closed-book test.
Students collect local population data and present an evidence briefing.
A department’s syllabus becomes a whole‑term plan — activity by activity, against the AI policy the school actually wrote. Every exclusion names who decided it.
Four teachers, a shared drive, and the school’s policy. None of it written for us, and most of it none of our business.
The department already did the intellectual work. We read it before we propose anything, and every unit keeps the sentence it came from.
Students design and carry out an osmosis investigation and write it up individually.
Enzyme rate practical with an assessed write-up.
Ends with an independent closed-book test.
Students collect local population data and present an evidence briefing.
One unit can hold a protected assessment, a guided AI activity and a teacher-preparation task at once. So the activity is the decision, never the unit.
Students draft their own controls first, then ask for uncontrolled variables only.
The observation is the evidence base for the whole unit.
Preparation. Never in front of the class, never on student work.
The output is the object of study, checked against what they saw.
Individually assessed. The school’s policy prohibits AI in summative work.
Not a setting. Not a preference. Three decisions that cannot be skipped, and no flag that removes them.
The teacher verifies the extracted curriculum before any recommendation begins.
They include, hold, or leave out — one activity at a time, free and local.
A version is approved and kept immutably. Until then it is only a proposal.
What is left is not a gap. It is protected work, with the authority for that boundary attached — policy, curriculum, or our recommendation.
A department’s scheme of work is its intellectual property. Here is the specific answer, not a policy paragraph — the kind you can repeat in a governors’ meeting.
Every one of these has been requested by somebody. Every one is a no, because each would put us between a teacher and a judgement that is theirs to make.
No blank page, no prompt library, no new system for your class to learn. One document you already have, and about forty-five minutes of your time.
Tools that add work get abandoned in week three. Here is the whole ask for one course, one term.
That twenty-five minutes is the hinge. A plan built on our guess at your curriculum is worth nothing; a plan built on your correction of it is worth the term.
Week by week, with the AI-free units marked in the plan rather than in a footnote you have to remember.
Ready to teach, including the one-line disclosure a student writes when they used AI — the same wording across the school.
Exported to slides, PDF or Word. Yours to change, and yours to keep if you stop using us.
Three points where the work stops and waits for you. Not a setting, not a preference — there is no flag that removes them, for anyone.
You correct the units, the hours and the assessments before anything is proposed.
Include it, hold it for next term, or leave it out. One activity at a time.
You approve a version. Work you have already approved is never rewritten underneath you.
The administrator console governs what is allowed across every class. It deliberately shows you nothing about individual teachers — that is a design decision, not a missing feature.
Approved tools, minimum age, parental consent, devices, permitted and prohibited uses, disclosure wording, assessment windows.
A master switch on student-facing AI, plus which of the four modes are available at all in your school.
Invite-only or open joining, staff added and removed by you, and every access change written to an append-only record.
Every competitor sells you a dashboard here. We will not, because a list of who is using a tool is one step from a list of who is judged by it.
We would rather one science department taught from this all term than have six departments issued a licence in September. Adoption is the only number that means anything.
Data handling, retention, subprocessors and what we will not build. Answered specifically, and the full pack is available before you ask for it.
A department’s scheme of work is its intellectual property. Here is the specific answer, not a policy paragraph — the kind you can repeat in a governors’ meeting.
Every one of these has been requested by somebody. Every one is a no, because each would put us between a teacher and a judgement that is theirs to make.
No NDA, no form, no sales call first. Ask and it arrives.
Every category of information the system holds, generated from the code itself rather than written by hand, so it cannot drift from what is true.
Where each document goes, which processor sees it, and where it stops.
How long things are kept, how a school exports everything, and what a certificate of destruction contains.
Every third party in the chain, what they see, and where they are.
Per-seat pricing punishes a school for inviting the teacher who was unsure. We would rather they came along, so a department is one price however many staff it has.
One department, one term, no charge and no card. You keep every plan, package and resource whatever you decide afterwards.
One price for the department, however many teachers are in it. Adding the cautious colleague costs nothing.
Export everything as readable files at any time. Ending it triggers deletion and a certificate of what was destroyed.
Not a rollout. One course read and verified by the teacher who wrote it, and a term plan they can hold.
Or use ours. The Compound Intellect Standard ships in the box, so a department is never blocked waiting on a committee.
A single scheme of work, read and verified by the person who wrote it. About forty-five minutes of their time.
A term plan, lesson packages and resources they can edit and export. Yours to keep whatever happens next.
If nothing gets taught twice, it did not work — and we would rather know that in March than pretend otherwise.